Lets first read Quran Ch. 33, verse. 33
وقرن في بيوتكن ولاتبرجن تبرج الجاهلية الاولى واقمن الصلاة واتين الزكاة واطعن الله ورسوله انما يريد الله ليذهب عنكم الرجس اهل البيت ويطهركم تطهيرا
[033:033] And stay quietly in your houses, and make not a dazzling display, like that of the former Times of Ignorance; and establish regular Prayer, and give regular Charity; and obey God and His Apostle. And God only wishes to remove all abomination from you, ye members of the Family, and to make you pure and spotless.
AA team wants to exclude the wives of the Holy Prophet (s) from the later part of the verse, and it says:
If we analyse the verse we see that Ahl’ul bayt (as) are addressed with the masculine / plural term ‘Kum’ whilst in the Qur’an the wives of the Prophet (s) are addressed in the plural feminine ‘Kun’. We challenge the followers of Mu’awiya to show us a single verse of the Qur’an where the wives of the Prophet are addressed with a masculine term.
Lets read Holy Quran Ch. 11, verse. 71-73
وامراته قائمة فضحكت فبشرناها باسحاق ومن وراء اسحاق يعقوب
قالت ياويلتي ءالد وانا عجوز وهذا بعلي شيخا ان هذا لشئ عجيب
قالوا اتعجبين من امر الله رحمة الله وبركاته عليكم اهل البيت انه حميد مجيد
[011:071-73] And his wife was standing (there), and she laughed: But we gave her glad tidings of Isaac, and after him, of Jacob.
She said: “Alas for me! shall I bear a child, seeing I am an old woman, and my husband here is an old man? That would indeed be a wonderful thing!”
They said: “Dost thou wonder at God’s decree? The grace of God and His blessings on you, o ye people of the house! for He is indeed worthy of all praise, full of all glory!”
As you can see, Lady Sarah (s) , the wife of Prophet Abraham (a.s) has been addressed with a masculine term ‘kum’ which is 2nd person masculine plural pronoun.
http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=11&verse=73
So the wives of the Prophet (s) can’t be excluded from the ahlelbayt because of the stupid reason of Answering-Ansar because if we have to accept that, we would have to reject Sarah (a.s) as the ahlelbayt in Quran Ch. 11, verse 33, which would be absolutely against Quran. Because the address is towards a female
قالوا اتعجبين من امر الله
Qaloo ataAAjabeena min amri Allahi
[011:073] They said: “Dost thou wonder at God’s decree?
Where ‘taAAjabeena’ is 2nd person feminine singular verb . So if we have to accept the theory of Answering-Ansar, how will we answer this verse of Quran?
May Allah protect us from the deceptions of taqiyah practitioners. Ameen.
Answering-Ansar Unveiled 
Comments
I think u r a MORON Idiot@web master
Wt AA is saying ‘show a single verse in wich AllaH is adresing only Wives of Prophet(saww) with masculine term
In the Arabic language,
different gender groups are referred to
with different grammatical tenses:
Men = (um) = ﻢﻛ
Man and Woman = (um) = ﻢﻛ
Women = (un) = ﻦﻛ
The verses u showed were of Man n Women.
I cannot find a single verse where AllaH is adresing to Only wifes of PROPHET(saww) with masculine term. ‘Um’
Even in sura Ahzab, verse 34
Wathkurna ma yutlafee
buyootikunna min ayati Allahi
walhikmatiinna Allaha kana
lateefan khabeera
AllAH is adresing wifes of PROPHET(saww) with feminine term…..y so….y only verse 33 with masculine term.!?
Read Holy Quran Ch. 11, Verse 73
قَالُوا أَتَعْجَبِينَ مِنْ أَمْرِ اللَّهِ ۖ رَحْمَتُ اللَّهِ وَبَرَكَاتُهُ عَلَيْكُمْ أَهْلَ الْبَيْتِ ۚ إِنَّهُ حَمِيدٌ مَّجِيدٌ
They said, “Are you amazed at the decree of Allah ? May the mercy of Allah and His blessings be upon you, people of the house. Indeed, He is Praiseworthy and Honorable.”
Here the wife of Prophet Ibrahim, Lady Sara has been addressed with ‘kum’, which is a masculine plural term.
If u want to Impress ur Reader….then dont post LAME articles
Post aricles on basic religious beliefs.
[Don’t post Shia articles in the Comments section. Post edited by Admin]
For 11:73
___________
Here the term Ahlul-BaiT is refered to family of hz.Ibrahim(as)
And,
If the meaning of the word Ahl’ulbayt is
linked to the wives of the Prophet only
then the scholars should have addressed
the wives as Zawaaj un Nabi (i.e. wives of
the Prophet) instead of using the
terminology Ahl’ulbayt.
The thing is that in the verse 11:73, the wife of Prophet Ibrahim is present, whether you include others or not. But you can’t exclude her. Hence she is the ahlul bayt. This is sufficient to understand that wives of a Prophet are his ahlel bayt. That is why the Shia scholar Farman Ali, in his commentary on the Quran “…In the verse before this one, Hadhrat Sara (as) was addressed with the present feminine singular form and in this verse she was addressed with the singular masculine present form, which clearly shows that the people who are addressed in this verse are not the same people and this verse was inserted here without any reason.” [Tafseer e Farman Ali, Commentary on Verse 11:73]
Look how your scholar tried to prove that this verse has actually been manipulated. Shame on your kafir scholars.
Listen……U product of misyar n urfi 😉
Hadhrat Sara(as) shared blood lineage with
Hadhrat Ibraheem (as). She was his
uncle’s daughter, was the mother of
Prophet Isaac and the grandmother of
Prophet Yaqoob (as). All Prophets come
from Banu Israeel so she was counted as
Ahl’ul bayt (as) due to the fact that she
shared her blood lineage with the
Prophets.
You hardly look like a slave of Imam Mahdi with your filthy language, you should change your name to slave of abu luluah al-majoosi.
If Hadhrat Sara (as) has been declared Ahlel bayt because she was the uncle’s daughter of Prophet Ibraheem, than Aqeel should also be the ahlel bayt of Prophet Muhammad (saww) because he is also the son of uncle of Prophet Muhammad (saww). Now show me from your books that Aqeel (ra) is considered ahlel bayt by your scholars, or stop this childish behaviour, and accept the reality like a man.
We shias do not count Hz.Sara(as) among Ahlul-BaiT by our Choise.
It was the Choise of ALLAH(swt).
N Testmony of Hz.Aisha(ra) is sufficient…….who are among Ahlul-BaiT.
READ!!!!
Sahih Muslim, Chapter of virtues of
companions, section of the virtues of
the Ahlul-Bayt of the Prophet
(PBUH&HF), 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi
Arabia, Arabic version, v4, p1883,
Tradition #61.
It is getting funnier, I would stop commenting from here onwards.
hmm
I think ur digestive system is not working properly..
U cant absorb now on-words.
Go…get lost u son of barking bitch(mauwiyah) 😉
Sory I forgot to write…..mauwiyah'(LANTI)’ 🙂