Quran 33:33 and Challenge of Answering-Ansar

Lets first read Quran Ch. 33, verse. 33

وقرن في بيوتكن ولاتبرجن تبرج الجاهلية الاولى واقمن الصلاة واتين الزكاة واطعن الله ورسوله انما يريد الله ليذهب عنكم الرجس اهل البيت ويطهركم تطهيرا

[033:033]  And stay quietly in your houses, and make not a dazzling display, like that of the former Times of Ignorance; and establish regular Prayer, and give regular Charity; and obey God and His Apostle. And God only wishes to remove all abomination from you, ye members of the Family, and to make you pure and spotless.

AA team wants to exclude the wives of the Holy Prophet (s) from the later part of the verse, and it says:

If we analyse the verse we see that Ahl’ul bayt (as) are addressed with the masculine / plural term ‘Kum’ whilst in the Qur’an the wives of the Prophet (s) are addressed in the plural feminine ‘Kun’. We challenge the followers of Mu’awiya to show us a single verse of the Qur’an where the wives of the Prophet are addressed with a masculine term.

Lets read Holy Quran Ch. 11, verse. 71-73

وامراته قائمة فضحكت فبشرناها باسحاق ومن وراء اسحاق يعقوب

قالت ياويلتي ءالد وانا عجوز وهذا بعلي شيخا ان هذا لشئ عجيب

قالوا اتعجبين من امر الله رحمة الله وبركاته عليكم اهل البيت انه حميد مجيد

[011:071-73]  And his wife was standing (there), and she laughed: But we gave her glad tidings of Isaac, and after him, of Jacob.

 She said: “Alas for me! shall I bear a child, seeing I am an old woman, and my husband here is an old man? That would indeed be a wonderful thing!”

They said: “Dost thou wonder at God’s decree? The grace of God and His blessings on you, o ye people of the house! for He is indeed worthy of all praise, full of all glory!”

As you can see, Lady Sarah (s) , the wife of Prophet Abraham (a.s) has been addressed with a masculine term ‘kum’ which is 2nd person masculine plural pronoun.

http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=11&verse=73

So the wives of the Prophet (s) can’t be excluded from the ahlelbayt because of the stupid reason of Answering-Ansar because if we have to accept that, we would have to reject Sarah (a.s) as the ahlelbayt in Quran Ch. 11, verse 33, which would be absolutely against Quran. Because the address is towards a female

قالوا اتعجبين من امر الله

Qaloo ataAAjabeena min amri Allahi

[011:073]  They said: “Dost thou wonder at God’s decree?

Where ‘taAAjabeena’ is 2nd person feminine singular verb . So if we have to accept the theory of Answering-Ansar, how will we answer this verse of Quran?

May Allah protect us from the deceptions of taqiyah practitioners. Ameen.

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Comments

  • Slave of Imam Mahdi(atjfs)  On July 4, 2013 at 4:44 pm

    I think u r a MORON Idiot@web master

    Wt AA is saying ‘show a single verse in wich AllaH is adresing only Wives of Prophet(saww) with masculine term

    In the Arabic language,
    different gender groups are referred to
    with different grammatical tenses:

    Men = (um) = ﻢﻛ
    Man and Woman = (um) = ﻢﻛ
    Women = (un) = ﻦﻛ

    The verses u showed were of Man n Women.

    I cannot find a single verse where AllaH is adresing to Only wifes of PROPHET(saww) with masculine term. ‘Um’

    Even in sura Ahzab, verse 34

    Wathkurna ma yutlafee
    buyootikunna min ayati Allahi
    walhikmatiinna Allaha kana
    lateefan khabeera

    AllAH is adresing wifes of PROPHET(saww) with feminine term…..y so….y only verse 33 with masculine term.!?

    • abdullah  On July 4, 2013 at 6:31 pm

      Read Holy Quran Ch. 11, Verse 73

      قَالُوا أَتَعْجَبِينَ مِنْ أَمْرِ اللَّهِ ۖ رَحْمَتُ اللَّهِ وَبَرَكَاتُهُ عَلَيْكُمْ أَهْلَ الْبَيْتِ ۚ إِنَّهُ حَمِيدٌ مَّجِيدٌ

      They said, “Are you amazed at the decree of Allah ? May the mercy of Allah and His blessings be upon you, people of the house. Indeed, He is Praiseworthy and Honorable.”

      Here the wife of Prophet Ibrahim, Lady Sara has been addressed with ‘kum’, which is a masculine plural term.

  • Slave of Imam Mahdi(atjfs)  On July 4, 2013 at 4:48 pm

    If u want to Impress ur Reader….then dont post LAME articles

    Post aricles on basic religious beliefs.

  • Slave of Imam Mahdi(atjfs)  On July 5, 2013 at 3:08 pm

    [Don’t post Shia articles in the Comments section. Post edited by Admin]

  • Slave of Imam Mahdi(atjfs)  On July 6, 2013 at 5:17 am

    For 11:73
    ___________

    Here the term Ahlul-BaiT is refered to family of hz.Ibrahim(as)
    And,
    If the meaning of the word Ahl’ulbayt is
    linked to the wives of the Prophet only
    then the scholars should have addressed
    the wives as Zawaaj un Nabi (i.e. wives of
    the Prophet) instead of using the
    terminology Ahl’ulbayt.

    • abdullah  On July 6, 2013 at 1:09 pm

      The thing is that in the verse 11:73, the wife of Prophet Ibrahim is present, whether you include others or not. But you can’t exclude her. Hence she is the ahlul bayt. This is sufficient to understand that wives of a Prophet are his ahlel bayt. That is why the Shia scholar Farman Ali, in his commentary on the Quran “…In the verse before this one, Hadhrat Sara (as) was addressed with the present feminine singular form and in this verse she was addressed with the singular masculine present form, which clearly shows that the people who are addressed in this verse are not the same people and this verse was inserted here without any reason.” [Tafseer e Farman Ali, Commentary on Verse 11:73]

      Look how your scholar tried to prove that this verse has actually been manipulated. Shame on your kafir scholars.

  • Slave of Imam Mahdi(atjfs)  On July 6, 2013 at 2:03 pm

    Listen……U product of misyar n urfi 😉

    Hadhrat Sara(as) shared blood lineage with
    Hadhrat Ibraheem (as). She was his
    uncle’s daughter, was the mother of
    Prophet Isaac and the grandmother of
    Prophet Yaqoob (as). All Prophets come
    from Banu Israeel so she was counted as
    Ahl’ul bayt (as) due to the fact that she
    shared her blood lineage with the
    Prophets.

    • abdullah  On July 7, 2013 at 2:55 pm

      You hardly look like a slave of Imam Mahdi with your filthy language, you should change your name to slave of abu luluah al-majoosi.

      If Hadhrat Sara (as) has been declared Ahlel bayt because she was the uncle’s daughter of Prophet Ibraheem, than Aqeel should also be the ahlel bayt of Prophet Muhammad (saww) because he is also the son of uncle of Prophet Muhammad (saww). Now show me from your books that Aqeel (ra) is considered ahlel bayt by your scholars, or stop this childish behaviour, and accept the reality like a man.

  • Slave of Imam Mahdi(atjfs)  On July 7, 2013 at 4:54 pm

    We shias do not count Hz.Sara(as) among Ahlul-BaiT by our Choise.

    It was the Choise of ALLAH(swt).

    N Testmony of Hz.Aisha(ra) is sufficient…….who are among Ahlul-BaiT.

    READ!!!!

    Sahih Muslim, Chapter of virtues of
    companions, section of the virtues of
    the Ahlul-Bayt of the Prophet
    (PBUH&HF), 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi
    Arabia, Arabic version, v4, p1883,
    Tradition #61.

    • abdullah  On July 8, 2013 at 12:46 pm

      It is getting funnier, I would stop commenting from here onwards.

  • Slave of Imam Mahdi(atjfs)  On July 8, 2013 at 2:42 pm

    hmm
    I think ur digestive system is not working properly..

    U cant absorb now on-words.

    Go…get lost u son of barking bitch(mauwiyah) 😉

  • Slave of Imam Mahdi(atjfs)  On July 8, 2013 at 2:45 pm

    Sory I forgot to write…..mauwiyah'(LANTI)’ 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: